Re:
|
Corn Products International, Inc | |
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended | ||
December 31, 2006 | ||
Filed February 27, 2007 | ||
File No. 1-13397 |
1. | We note your assertion that the 20 day trading average put feature of your redeemable common stock approximates fair value. Please provide us with a basis for your assertion. In your response, please show us the resulting differences in EPS from applying the two methods for the periods presented. Also, please address whether heightened stock price volatility creates the opportunity for the holder to realize a value different from fair value. |
1. | The assertion that the 20 trading day average price put feature of the redeemable common stock approximates fair value was based on the close proximity of the 20 trading day average price to the closing price at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The agreement was negotiated between the parties and the 20 trading day average was evaluated to be a fair value strike price for the Company stock. It was also felt that the effect on the earnings per share calculation from applying the two methods was not material. | ||
Attached is a worksheet that compares the two methods for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 on a diluted earnings per common share basis. | |||
For the year 2005, the 20 trading day average price was below the year end closing price. Since the calculation would have been anti-dilutive, there would be no difference between the two methods. | |||
In 2006, the 20 trading day average price was $1.32 higher than the year end closing price. The effect on the earnings per share calculation would have been the difference between the reported amount of $1.63 and a calculated amount of $1.61 or $0.02. | |||
In 2007, the redeemable shares were reduced to 500,000 shares. The variance between the 20 trading day average and the year end closing price was $1.55. The effect on the earnings per share calculation would have been the difference between the reported amount of $2.59 and a calculated amount of $2.58 or $0.01. | |||
In assessing materiality, the Company has reviewed SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99 Materiality. Based on a review of the criteria, it is felt that the impact of the difference is not material. |
2. | We note your response to our prior comment number 17, by reference to our prior comment number 13, and are continuing to consider your response. |
2. | The Company will respond as appropriate to any future comments you may have on this item. |
| it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings; | ||
| staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and | ||
| the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. |
12/31/2005 | 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007 | ||||||||||
Weighted Ave. Shares Outstanding Diluted |
75,564 | 75,753 | 76,473 | |||||||||
Redeemable Shares |
1,227 | 1,227 | 500 | |||||||||
Non Redeemable Shares |
74,337 | 74,526 | 75,973 | |||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 89,594 | $ | 123,498 | $ | 197,822 | ||||||
20 Day Average Price per share |
$ | 23.43 | $ | 35.86 | $ | 38.30 | ||||||
12/31 Closing Price per share |
$ | 23.89 | $ | 34.54 | $ | 36.75 | ||||||
Variance per share |
$ | (0.46 | ) | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.55 | |||||
Premium/(Discount) |
$ | (564 | ) | $ | 1,620 | $ | 775 | |||||
EPS Redeemable Shares |
$ | 0.73 | $ | 2.93 | $ | 4.13 | ||||||
EPS Remaining Shareholders |
$ | 1.19 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 2.58 | ||||||
Reported EPS Diluted |
$ | 1.19 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 2.59 |